In the data room, an investor asks a simple question: does the company actually own its code, brand and domain? The answer is surprisingly often "not entirely". Under the Slovak Copyright Act, a freelancer who wrote part of the product without a licence agreement keeps the economic rights, even after being paid. Gaps like this can be fixed, but it is easier before signing than mid-negotiation.
We tailor the audit to your side of the deal. For a buyer, we set out the risks and their effect on price; for a seller, we prepare materials for bidders in advance. We go through trade mark and patent registers, contracts with employees and contractors, open source licences and the domain portfolio. You receive a written report, an IP register, a risk matrix and a remediation plan.
Without an express licence or rights agreement under Section 65 of the Slovak Copyright Act, the economic rights stay with the freelancer. The company then cannot use the work in full, even though it paid for it.
With strong copyleft licences such as the GPL, incorrect use can lead to an obligation to release the source code of the entire derivative product. The AGPL extends these obligations to SaaS deployment.
Each finding is rated by its effect on the deal: from a risk that threatens closing, through a price adjustment or specific indemnity, to remediation before or after closing.
Tick what you already have. You can print the list or save it as a PDF. Your ticks are remembered only in your browser.
0 of 8 ready
In a consultation we assess your situation, suggest a way forward and tell you what costs to expect.
€90 incl. VAT, 30 minutes, in person or online
This page is for general information, reflects Slovak law at the time of writing and is not a substitute for advice on your particular matter.