Your chatbot quotes a customer the wrong price, or a recruitment tool quietly disadvantages female applicants. Saying the AI made the mistake is not a defence. Slovakia has no specific statute on damage caused by artificial intelligence, so claims are assessed under the Slovak Civil Code and product liability rules. What matters is who in the chain failed: the model developer, the integrator or the business using the system.
We act for both sides. For companies that supply or use AI, we set up vendor contracts, liability caps, indemnities and insurance. For injured parties, we help secure evidence, identify who is liable and choose the right legal basis for the claim. If the matter cannot be settled out of court, we represent you before the Slovak courts.
Under Section 420, everyone is liable for damage caused by breaching a legal duty, but can escape liability by proving they were not at fault. Section 421a covers damage caused by the nature of a device or thing used to perform an obligation, and this liability cannot be avoided.
Directive (EU) 2024/2853 expressly treats software and AI systems as products. Member States must transpose it by 9 December 2026. Anyone who substantially modifies a product, for example by fine-tuning it on their own data, may be treated as its manufacturer.
The Commission withdrew its proposed AI Liability Directive in February 2025. It cannot be relied on before the courts.
Where several persons caused damage together, they are jointly and severally liable under Section 438 of the Civil Code. The injured party can claim the full amount from any of them, and they settle their shares between themselves.
Articles are in Slovak.
Tick what you already have. You can print the list or save it as a PDF. Your ticks are remembered only in your browser.
0 of 8 ready
In a consultation we assess your situation, suggest a way forward and tell you what costs to expect.
€90 incl. VAT, 30 minutes, in person or online
This page is for general information, reflects Slovak law at the time of writing and is not a substitute for advice on your particular matter.