The administrative court has dismissed your action and its judgment is final. What remains is a cassation complaint to the Supreme Administrative Court of the Slovak Republic. That court does not establish the facts again; it examines whether the lower court decided in line with the law, on the grounds the complainant raises. New facts and evidence can generally no longer be introduced, so what is already on file is decisive.
First, we give an honest view on whether a cassation complaint is worthwhile. We read the judgment, the action and the administrative file and compare them with the case law of the Supreme Administrative Court and the Court of Justice of the EU. If there are grounds, we draft them and file the complaint in time. Representation by a lawyer is mandatory for the complaint and for every later submission in the proceedings.
The complaint must be filed within one month of delivery of the administrative court's decision (Section 443 of the Administrative Court Procedure Code). It is lodged with the court that issued the decision.
The complainant must be represented by a lawyer (Section 449). One exception is where the complainant or its employee holds a master's level law degree.
A complaint may rely only on the grounds listed in Section 440, such as an incorrect legal assessment or a serious procedural defect. The grounds can be changed only until the deadline expires.
Articles are in Slovak.
Tick what you already have. You can print the list or save it as a PDF. Your ticks are remembered only in your browser.
0 of 9 ready
In a consultation we assess your situation, suggest a way forward and tell you what costs to expect.
€90 incl. VAT, 30 minutes, in person or online
This page is for general information, reflects Slovak law at the time of writing and is not a substitute for advice on your particular matter.